🔹 Lalkara Bail Dismissed | 2021 PCrLJ 47 (Lahore High Court Judgment Explained in Urdu)
Keywords: Lalkara Bail Dismissed, 2021 PCrLJ 47 Lahore, Post Arrest Bail, Section 497 CrPC, Pakistani Criminal Law, Urdu Law Blog
Search Description:
Learn how Lahore High Court explained the law about shouting Lalkara during a crime and why the bail of the accused was dismissed under Section 497 Cr.P.C. (2021 PCrLJ 47 Lahore). Detailed Urdu + English explanation for law students and advocates.
⚖️ Introduction | Case Summary in Urdu
عام طور پر ایسے ملزمان کو جن پر للکارا مارنے (Lalkara) کا الزام ہو، عدالت بعد از گرفتاری ضمانت (Post-Arrest Bail) دے دیتی ہے۔
لیکن Lahore High Court نے مقدمہ 2021 PCrLJ 47 میں واضح کیا کہ یہ کوئی سخت اور لازمی اصول نہیں ہے۔
عدالت نے قرار دیا کہ ایسے مقدمات میں LLalkara مارنے والے ملزم کی نیت، کردار اور اثر و رسوخ کو دیکھنا ضروری ہے۔
📜 Case Law Reference:
Citation: 2021 PCrLJ 47 (Lahore)
Bench: Lahore High Court
Subject: Post-Arrest Bail – Lalkara – Section 497 Cr.P.C
🧾 Judgment Explanation in Urdu + English (Mixed)
Court نے observe کیا کہ:
“A person burdened with the allegation of shouting lalkara is generally granted post-arrest bail, but this rule is not inflexible.”
عدالت نے کہا کہ ایسے معاملات میں یہ دیکھنا ضروری ہے کہ:
-
ملزم نے للکارا کس پس منظر میں مارا؟
-
اس کا جرم میں کتنا مفاد تھا؟
-
وہ اپنے ساتھیوں پر کتنا اثر رکھتا تھا؟
If the record shows that the accused had deep-rooted interest in the crime and was in a commanding position, his act of shouting lalkara becomes a significant overt act in the commission of the offence.
عدالت نے مزید کہا کہ:
“اگر للکارا مارنے والا شخص اپنے ساتھیوں پر غلبہ رکھتا ہو اور وہ انہیں قابو میں رکھنے کی صلاحیت رکھتا ہو مگر اس نے ایسا نہ کیا، بلکہ ان کو مزید بھڑکایا، تو اس کو ضمانت کی رعایت نہیں دی جا سکتی۔”
🧠 Legal Analysis | Section 497(1) Cr.P.C.
According to Section 497(1) Cr.P.C., post-arrest bail depends on whether reasonable grounds exist to believe that the accused is guilty.
In this case, the Court found that:
-
The accused did not attempt to stop the violence.
-
Instead, he provoked others by shouting Lalkara.
-
His act led to the death of two real brothers.
لہٰذا عدالت نے کہا کہ یہ للکارا محض روایتی نہیں بلکہ ایک حکم دینے والے انداز میں تھا۔
❌ Result: Bail Dismissed
The Lahore High Court dismissed the bail of the accused, stating that his Lalkara was not a mere shout but a commanding act contributing to murder.
Held:
“Since the petitioner was in a position of influence but failed to pacify the situation, rather ignited it through his lalkara resulting in two murders — Bail Dismissed.”
📚 Key Takeaways for Law Students & Lawyers
-
Lalkara (للکارا) can be considered an active participation in crime if done with intent and influence.
-
Bail under Section 497 Cr.P.C. is not automatic even for verbal acts if they contribute to the offence.
-
Judicial discretion depends on the accused’s role, intent, and control over co-offenders.