Blockage of CNIC of Absconder in Criminal & Family Cases - NADRA’s Role, Legal Process, & Restoration Guide
شناختی کارڈ فوجداری مقدمات ،فیملی مقدمات میں کب،کیوں،کون،کیسے نادرا سے بلاک کیا جاسکتا ہے اور پھر کب ،کیسے،کون،کیسے نادرا سے آن بلاک کیا جاسکتا ہے ۔شناختی کارڈ بلاک کرنے سے، کسی بھی شخص کو حاضری کےلئے مجبور کیا جاسکتا ہے
قانون کی نظر سے بھاگنے والا ملزم اپنا شناختی کارڈ نمبر بلاک کروا سکتا ہے ۔۔۔ لیکن جب پیش عدالت ہو، وضاحت دے کر بحال بھی کروا سکتا ہے ۔۔۔
فیملی اجرا میں مدیون کو حاضری یا مقدمہ فوجداری میں ملزم کو گرفتاری دینے پر مجبور کرنے کیلئے اسکا قومی شناختی کارڈ بلاک نہ کیا جا سکتا ھے
فیملی اجرا میں مدیون کو حاضری یا مقدمہ فوجداری میں ملزم کو گرفتاری دینے پر مجبور کرنے کیلئے اسکا قومی شناختی کارڈ بلاک نہ کیا جا سکتا ھے
PLJ 2022 Lahore 803
Family Courts Act, 1964 (XXXV of 1964)--
----S. 17--Execution of decree of dower--Blocking of national identity card--S. 10/11/12//18(2)/19 of National data base registration authority Ordinance, 2000--Art. 175 of Constitution of Pakistan, 1973--The National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000, (NADRA) provides for registration of all persons--Section 10 entitles every citizen to have National Identity Card who has attained age of 18 years and is registered under section 9--The Ordinance also makes provision for issuance of Pakistan Origin Cards (section 11), Overseas Identity Cards (section 12) and Alien Registration Cards (section 13), Section 19(4) stipulates that--In this backdrop it can be legitimately argued that CNIC is essential for enjoyment of a number of fundamental rights guaranteed by Constitution--A person cannot be deprived of it without due process--Section 18(1) of Ordinance stipulates--Executing Court has passed impugned order without taking section 18 of Ordinance into consideration--The said section does not allow blocking/digital impounding of CNIC of a person to compel him to appear before court--This cannot be permitted because it does not have sanction of law--Such orders are contrary to Article 175(2) of Constitution and concept of rule of law.
National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000--
----S. 19(4)--Issuance of card--Cards issued under Ordinance, including National Identity Card, shall be proof of identity as could be established from contents of such card.
National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000--
----S. 18(1)—Property of Federal Government--All cards issued by NADRA, including CNIC, shall be property of Federal Government and it may cancel, impound or confiscate it by an order after giving a show cause notice to holder۔
Blockage of CNIC, Purpose, Effect, and Restoration
Read carefully Line by Line, Word by Word قانون کی نظر سے بھاگنے والا ملزم اپنا شناختی کارڈ نمبر بلاک کروا سکتا ہے ۔۔۔ لیکن جب پیش عدالت ہو، وضاحت دے کر بحال بھی کروا سکتا ہے ۔۔۔ شکریہ
According to subsection 4(g) of section 88 of the Code, the trial Court is empowered to issue an order in writing prohibiting the payment of rent or delivery of property to the proclaimed offender or to anyone on his behalf. Nowadays, a Pakistani cannot enter in a transaction through banking channel if he does not possess a CNIC issued by NADRA. The trial Court may issue such directions to the NADRA for digitally impounding or blocking the CNIC of absconding accused. After blocking or digitally impounding of CNIC, the person will become helpless and he cannot open or operate a bank account, obtain a passport and he also face hardship in so many other daily routines. If the details of CNIC is not available with the trial Court, the same can be obtained by issuing directions to NADRA Authorities through investigating officer, and it may be arranged through prosecuting agency by approaching the Family Tree of proclaimed offender from the data bank of NADRA. It is worthwhile to point out that the aim and object of subsection 4(g) of section 88 of the Code is to strangulate the financial resources to reach to the absconding accused, as such the trial Court may attach/stop salary of a proclaimed offender, if he is a government employee or serving in any corporation or private entity, and may also direct the state bank to frieze the bank accounts of a proclaimed offender until he surrenders himself before the law. It is not out of place to mention that all these actions against an accused cannot be taken unless a proper proclamation under section 87 of the Code is issued against him, and whenever the absconding accused appear before the trial Court and offer some explanation, and give assurance to face trial, the trial Court should not be languid in restoring his financial resources especially his salary and bank accounts.
---- #2019PCrLJ126
فیملی کیس میں اجراء کے دوران جب مدیون۔کو ڈگری کے execution میں پکڑا جاتا ہے اور کوئی بعد میں surety اس باںت دے کہ اگر یہ ادا نہ کرے گا تو میں دوں گا، تو اس صورت میں وہ surety اس اجراء کے باںت پاپند ہوگا۔۔
2020 CLC 970
Grand children had right to claim maintenance allowance from their grandfather if he was in easy circumstances. However, said right of grand children did not absolve the judgment debtor (father) or the surety respectively from making payment of decretal amount to the minors in terms of decree and surety bond submitted before the Executing Court. The liability of surety was coextensive with that of principal judgment debtor unless it was provided otherwise by the contract. Arrest of judgment debtor did not absolve the surety from making payment of decretal amount and his liability was joint and several with the judgment debtor. Petitioner had submitted surety to be paid in default of judgment debtor and while accepting liability, he had not made the same conditional upon or subject to any claim of the minors against grandfather. Objection petition by surety dismissed in the circumstances.
Tags
Legal Articles